
NY congresswoman Carolyn McCarthy honored Mr. Sheppard on the floor of the House of Representatives yesterday and asked that her colleagues do the same.
From Politicalnews.me:

We all knew this was a possibility, but now it has become fact. Andy Pettitte was excused from testifying before congress today, but in his deposition last week he made comments that contradicted statements made by Roger Clemens. Pettitte's statements lined up more with Brian McNamee's according to Tom Davis (R-Virginia), the co-chair of the congressional oversight committee investigating the use of P.E.D. in baseball.
We all knew this was a possibility, but now it has become fact. Andy Pettitte was excused from testifying before congress today, but in his deposition last week he made comments that contradicted statements made by Roger Clemens. Pettitte's statements lined up more with Brian McNamee's according to Tom Davis (R-Virginia), the co-chair of the congressional oversight committee investigating the use of P.E.D. in baseball.
The Roger Clemens-Brian McNamee tête-à-tête took a bit of a strange twist yesterday. McNamee reportedly turned over physical evidence last month that will show Clemens' use of P.E.D.
The Roger Clemens-Brian McNamee tête-à-tête took a bit of a strange twist yesterday. McNamee reportedly turned over physical evidence last month that will show Clemens' use of P.E.D.
It's hard to get the focus back on baseball today; we're still too filled with glee. But here goes.“Out of respect for the sensitive nature of these proceedings, and out of deference to the committee’s request for confidentiality, we, on behalf of Mr. Pettitte, will not comment on the nature or specifics of his testimony,” the lawyers Jay K. Reisinger and Thomas J. Farrell said.Needless to say, Roger Clemens must be sweating right about now, concerned about what Pettitte said in his deposition. Brian McNamee's counsel has been making it known that Pettitte would testify that he discussed HGH with Clemens, contradicting Clemens' statements on 60 Minutes. The Rocket has his turn to be deposed today. NY Times
It's hard to get the focus back on baseball today; we're still too filled with glee. But here goes.“Out of respect for the sensitive nature of these proceedings, and out of deference to the committee’s request for confidentiality, we, on behalf of Mr. Pettitte, will not comment on the nature or specifics of his testimony,” the lawyers Jay K. Reisinger and Thomas J. Farrell said.Needless to say, Roger Clemens must be sweating right about now, concerned about what Pettitte said in his deposition. Brian McNamee's counsel has been making it known that Pettitte would testify that he discussed HGH with Clemens, contradicting Clemens' statements on 60 Minutes. The Rocket has his turn to be deposed today. NY Times
If we are to believe Brian McNamee's lawyer, Earl Ward, Andy Pettitte may contradict Roger Clemens' claim that the Rocket knew nothing of Pettitte's HGH use when its the left-hander's time to meet with Congress. Ward believes Pettitte will testify that he discussed HGH with Clemens some time between the 2001 and 2002 seasons. That conversation reportedly lead to Pettitte's talk with McNamee on the subject."We're hopeful based on Andy's reputation that he will corroborate Brian's statements with regard to Roger," Ward said in a telephone interview.Pettitte was originally slated to be deposed yesterday, but it was pushed back until February 4. Pettitte's lawyer, Jay Reisinger, would not elaborate on what his client will discuss with Congress.
"Based on what we know, there was a situation where Andy was speaking to Roger in Brian's presence, then Andy came over to Brian and essentially said, 'Why didn't you tell me about this stuff?' He referred to HGH," Ward said. "Brian discouraged him and then several months later, when he (Pettitte) got injured, he came back and asked Brian about it, and that's when Brian injected him. We believe that based on the fact that Andy came to Brian and asked him about HGH, it was Roger who told Andy about HGH and that's why he asked Brian about it."
If we are to believe Brian McNamee's lawyer, Earl Ward, Andy Pettitte may contradict Roger Clemens' claim that the Rocket knew nothing of Pettitte's HGH use when its the left-hander's time to meet with Congress. Ward believes Pettitte will testify that he discussed HGH with Clemens some time between the 2001 and 2002 seasons. That conversation reportedly lead to Pettitte's talk with McNamee on the subject."We're hopeful based on Andy's reputation that he will corroborate Brian's statements with regard to Roger," Ward said in a telephone interview.Pettitte was originally slated to be deposed yesterday, but it was pushed back until February 4. Pettitte's lawyer, Jay Reisinger, would not elaborate on what his client will discuss with Congress.
"Based on what we know, there was a situation where Andy was speaking to Roger in Brian's presence, then Andy came over to Brian and essentially said, 'Why didn't you tell me about this stuff?' He referred to HGH," Ward said. "Brian discouraged him and then several months later, when he (Pettitte) got injured, he came back and asked Brian about it, and that's when Brian injected him. We believe that based on the fact that Andy came to Brian and asked him about HGH, it was Roger who told Andy about HGH and that's why he asked Brian about it."
Apparently Chuck Knoblauch was not hiding out in Mexico, with or without Jessica Simpson. Knobby had not returned calls from congressional contacts and was nowhere to be found when they tried to subpoena him. Knobby was probably just getting all his ducks in a row- translation: talking to some lawyers first."We are pleased that Mr. Knoblauch has agreed to voluntarily participate in a transcribed interview or deposition with the committee. As a result, the Committee is withdrawing the subpoena," House Oversight and Government Reform Committee chairman Henry Waxman and ranking Republican Tom Davis said in a statement.Good luck Knobby...if you have to hit one of their mothers in the head with a glass of water.
Apparently Chuck Knoblauch was not hiding out in Mexico, with or without Jessica Simpson. Knobby had not returned calls from congressional contacts and was nowhere to be found when they tried to subpoena him. Knobby was probably just getting all his ducks in a row- translation: talking to some lawyers first."We are pleased that Mr. Knoblauch has agreed to voluntarily participate in a transcribed interview or deposition with the committee. As a result, the Committee is withdrawing the subpoena," House Oversight and Government Reform Committee chairman Henry Waxman and ranking Republican Tom Davis said in a statement.Good luck Knobby...if you have to hit one of their mothers in the head with a glass of water.
Miguel Tejada is coming under scrutiny as the congressional committee prepares to meet next month to discuss performance enhancing drugs in baseball. With investigators already checking into claims by Roger Clemens that he did not use steroids, House Oversight and Government Reform Committee chairman Henry A. Waxman (D-Calif.) has asked investigators to look into whether or not Tejada lied under oath when he testified before congress.The Mitchell Report , Waxman noted, "directly contradicts key elements of Mr. Tejada's testimony."You can bet the Houston Astros are sweating right now- in addition to Tejada.
Wasting no time, Waxman and Davis dispatched a letter to Attorney General Michael Mukasey urging a criminal probe of the one-time American League MVP.
Miguel Tejada is coming under scrutiny as the congressional committee prepares to meet next month to discuss performance enhancing drugs in baseball. With investigators already checking into claims by Roger Clemens that he did not use steroids, House Oversight and Government Reform Committee chairman Henry A. Waxman (D-Calif.) has asked investigators to look into whether or not Tejada lied under oath when he testified before congress.The Mitchell Report , Waxman noted, "directly contradicts key elements of Mr. Tejada's testimony."You can bet the Houston Astros are sweating right now- in addition to Tejada.
Wasting no time, Waxman and Davis dispatched a letter to Attorney General Michael Mukasey urging a criminal probe of the one-time American League MVP.
"Brian knows a lot about Roger's moral character and knows a lot about his extracurricular activities. ... There's a lot that he could say to damage Roger's reputation, but we plan on taking the high road. ... If some of this stuff were to come out, Roger Clemens would look very, very, very bad."Congressional investigators are asking more probing questions as well as they try to determine the validity of both McNamee's and Clemens' claims.

"Brian knows a lot about Roger's moral character and knows a lot about his extracurricular activities. ... There's a lot that he could say to damage Roger's reputation, but we plan on taking the high road. ... If some of this stuff were to come out, Roger Clemens would look very, very, very bad."Congressional investigators are asking more probing questions as well as they try to determine the validity of both McNamee's and Clemens' claims.



For the first time since being named in the Mitchell Report, former Yankee Chuck Knoblauch has publicly commented on his inclusion in the "festivities". While he doesn't deny any wrong doing, he doesn't admit either. He does sound a little bitter though towards the game that brought him fame, and in some cases, infamy.“I have nothing to defend,” Knoblauch said. “I have nothing to hide at the same time.”Oddly, what bothered him most about being in the report is that he no longer has anything to do with baseball, and he wants to keep it that way.
“I’ve got nothing to do with any of that, I mean, any baseball.”Knoblauch plans to be at the congressional hearing on February 13, but has not been told any specifics.
“And I don’t want anything to do with baseball,” he added.
Philip M. Schiliro, the chief of staff for the committee holding the hearing, said he left several messages for Knoblauch, but has not heard back from him.“I read my name in the paper and see it on the news, but I haven’t heard a word,” Knoblauch said. “I’m supposed to be somewhere, but I haven’t been told where to be.”
Asked if he will talk to the committee, Knoblauch said: “Yeah, if I have to do that, then what are you going to do?”
For the first time since being named in the Mitchell Report, former Yankee Chuck Knoblauch has publicly commented on his inclusion in the "festivities". While he doesn't deny any wrong doing, he doesn't admit either. He does sound a little bitter though towards the game that brought him fame, and in some cases, infamy.“I have nothing to defend,” Knoblauch said. “I have nothing to hide at the same time.”Oddly, what bothered him most about being in the report is that he no longer has anything to do with baseball, and he wants to keep it that way.
“I’ve got nothing to do with any of that, I mean, any baseball.”Knoblauch plans to be at the congressional hearing on February 13, but has not been told any specifics.
“And I don’t want anything to do with baseball,” he added.
Philip M. Schiliro, the chief of staff for the committee holding the hearing, said he left several messages for Knoblauch, but has not heard back from him.“I read my name in the paper and see it on the news, but I haven’t heard a word,” Knoblauch said. “I’m supposed to be somewhere, but I haven’t been told where to be.”
Asked if he will talk to the committee, Knoblauch said: “Yeah, if I have to do that, then what are you going to do?”
Main Entry: clem·en·cy